Posted by Jacob on Friday, December 10, 2004 at 9:33 PM |Permalink
If necessary, pardon my inept understanding of your comment, but...if an imperfect sandwich is better than no sandwich, why would it be good to burn down a bad sandwich place?
Assuming that imperfect sandwich=bad sandwich: If bad sandwich place, then bad sandwiches. Bad sandwiches are better than no sandwiches. If no bad sandwich place, no sandwiches.
Your statement: Bad sandwich places should be torched. (This implies that a bad sandwich is actually WORSE than no sandwich, according to the above stipulations.)
I think we should form a group of those in favor of Ben taking a logic class...oh wait, he already did that...
If necessary, pardon my inept understanding of your comment, but...if an imperfect sandwich is better than no sandwich, why would it be good to burn down a bad sandwich place?
Assuming that imperfect sandwich=bad sandwich:
If bad sandwich place, then bad sandwiches.
Bad sandwiches are better than no sandwiches.
If no bad sandwich place, no sandwiches.
Your statement: Bad sandwich places should be torched. (This implies that a bad sandwich is actually WORSE than no sandwich, according to the above stipulations.)
I think we should form a group of those in favor of Ben taking a logic class...oh wait, he already did that...
Posted by Christy | 9:59 PM
I agree. Chrisy is more than capable of doing this sort of logic. Chrisy and I were in the same logic class with Becker. Chrisy an intelligent girl.
Come to think of it, Christy was in that class too...
Posted by andrew | 4:23 PM